<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A dog&#8217;s life ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.365questions.org/2007/07/02/a-dogs-life/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.365questions.org/2007/07/02/a-dogs-life/</link>
	<description>about online creativity.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: JFB</title>
		<link>http://www.365questions.org/2007/07/02/a-dogs-life/#comment-26096</link>
		<dc:creator>JFB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 09:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365questions.org/2007/07/02/a-dogs-life/#comment-26096</guid>
		<description>You're right. 
It coul save some time if you copy and paste a lot from other sites... But that's not really value added Blogging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right.<br />
It coul save some time if you copy and paste a lot from other sites&#8230; But that&#8217;s not really value added Blogging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pinksy</title>
		<link>http://www.365questions.org/2007/07/02/a-dogs-life/#comment-26030</link>
		<dc:creator>Pinksy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 23:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365questions.org/2007/07/02/a-dogs-life/#comment-26030</guid>
		<description>I've seen someone else use clipmarks, but I wonder what the real benefit is, compared to directly linking to an image, or right-click-saving and uploading to your own site? Okay, it might save space on your host account, but pictures are only a few Kb (if compressed for the web)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen someone else use clipmarks, but I wonder what the real benefit is, compared to directly linking to an image, or right-click-saving and uploading to your own site? Okay, it might save space on your host account, but pictures are only a few Kb (if compressed for the web)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
