Thank you Digg (for breaking my site)?
Update Sunday 15: I am still getting 1000 + visits /hour from Digg since my site is back. Thanks guys.
Update 2 (Monday 16) : 32 000 unique visitors since Saturday 14 evening (32 hours).
I restored the original page.
_______________
My server went down after one of my stories hit the homepage of Digg.
Here is the duggmirror graph on the number of Diggs it received over a few hours.

Here the flow of Traffic from Google analytics : more than 10 000 visitors until it broke down.

It’s the second time I get to Digg homepage. Last time, my host moved me definitively to a much too slow environment, I had to change host.
Now I am with Site5. They had to suspend my account for a while (too much resources used from their shared servers), but the customer service remained in touch with me all the time and restored the site as soon as the traffic peak was over.
Now the page still receives a lot of visits from digg, but without requiring access to the MySql database. Here is what I did :
Before hitting Digg front page, I downloaded my entire page on my desktop as html file.
Then, through FTP, I recreated the path to the page on my server :
I created 4 sub-directories like this :
/2007/04/10/who-has-the-best-sorry-page/
and I uploaded the saved Static page in the last directory. I named it index.html.
Now, incoming visitors from Digg access this page, which is not linked at all to the database. It is completely static (check the feedburner number, which is different from all other pages).
So it acts like a local cache or mirror, but totally transparently for the visitors who can browse the rest of the site (they don’t..).
Voilà !
Thanks Digg. That was a great birthday gift (I turned 36 yesterday).
Related Articles:
- Who has the best sorry page ?
- Are you a-diggted?
- 10 funniest Digg comments?
- Do you speak Web 2.0?
- Ever experienced the Digg tsunami ?

April 15th, 2007 at 2:15 pm
Amusant! Congratulation!
Avec le recul, un truc intéressant à connaitre est le nombre de “clients” fidèles que cela va t’apporter. Car dans mon cas dans une tout autre proportion (French Digg-like) je n’ai pas l’impression que cela m’apporte des “abonnés” et en tout cas aucun abonnés “Feedburner” supplémentaires.
Aussi ton expérience (célébrité soudaine …) m’intéresse.
A+
April 15th, 2007 at 5:13 pm
I took your web site unscheduled downtime screen sheet yesterday…. Which is blank,…. I like that too much :-)
Great stuff… Liked it
April 15th, 2007 at 5:20 pm
Thanks Toua ! I’ll keep you updated.
I don’t think Digg brings a lot of recurring visitors.
But it increase visibility on other sites and that can only benefit to getting new readers..
April 15th, 2007 at 6:14 pm
Perhaps you should consider installing WP-cache2 on your Wordpress configuration to mitigate against this sort of thing happening next time you hit Digg front page
April 15th, 2007 at 7:12 pm
Happy (belated) birthday!
April 15th, 2007 at 11:23 pm
thanks Becca. You and I didn’t sleep much last night, with our Blog thing..
April 15th, 2007 at 11:42 pm
It’s a full-time job. :)
April 16th, 2007 at 1:25 am
This was dugg by someone, so if you don’t already have it installed, install wp-cache. It’s a life saver.
April 16th, 2007 at 11:09 am
Wow - what was the post that got dugg?
April 16th, 2007 at 11:20 pm
Anita : I tried to install WP cache a while ago but it didn’t work for me (I had a database error).
I’d like to know if WP 2.1 is more robust in times of massive traffic.. If anyone knows..
April 17th, 2007 at 10:19 am
Happy birthday mate! .. Great to be Dugg isn’t it ?